The International Criminal Court (ICC) has made significant strides in its case against former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte, marking a pivotal moment in the pursuit of accountability for alleged crimes against humanity. Duterte, who led the controversial “war on drugs” campaign during his presidency, is accused of orchestrating widespread and systematic attacks against civilians, resulting in thousands of deaths.
On March 12, 2025, Duterte was surrendered to ICC custody following an arrest warrant issued by the Pre-Trial Chamber. The charges against him include murder, torture, and rape, committed between November 2011 and March 2019. The ICC’s decision to proceed with the case underscores its commitment to addressing grave human rights violations and ensuring justice for victims.
The court has also taken steps to streamline the legal process. A procedural order issued on April 17, 2025, limits the scope of evidence and sets a timeline for the confirmation of charges hearing, scheduled for September 23, 2025. This approach aims to enhance efficiency while safeguarding the rights of both the accused and the victims.
Victims of Duterte’s alleged crimes have been allowed to participate in the proceedings. The ICC has established mechanisms to ensure fairness, allowing individuals and organizations affected by the crimes to apply for recognition and reparations. This inclusive approach reflects the court’s dedication to amplifying the voices of those suffering.
The case against Duterte is not without challenges. His defense team has raised jurisdictional arguments, citing the Philippines’ withdrawal from the ICC in 2019. However, the court has maintained that it retains jurisdiction over crimes committed while the Philippines was a state party to the Rome Statute. Additionally, the ICC rejected an appeal by the Philippine government to halt the investigation into Duterte’s “war on drugs,” further solidifying the court’s authority to proceed.
The ICC’s decision to hold Duterte accountable is a landmark development in international law. It sends a powerful message that leaders cannot act with impunity and that justice will prevail, even in the face of political complexities. As the case unfolds, it will undoubtedly shape the discourse on human rights and the role of international institutions in upholding justice.
This moment reminds us of the importance of global cooperation in addressing crimes against humanity and ensuring that victims’ voices are heard. The ICC’s actions reaffirm its mission to stand as a beacon of hope for those seeking justice in adversity.
